Supports epithelial proliferations of the breast with and without atypia : atypical ductal hyperplasia, metaplasia cylindrical with atypia, lobular neoplasia, epithelial proliferations without atypia, fibrocystic mastopathy, adenosis, radial scars, mucoce

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreSupports epithelial proliferations of the breast with and without atypia : atypical ductal hyperplasia, metaplasia cylindrical with atypia, lobular neoplasia, epithelial proliferations without atypia, fibrocystic mastopathy, adenosis, radial scars, mucoce
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuteursCoutant C., Canlorbe G., Bendifallah S., Beltjens F.
JournalJOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION
Volume44
Pagination980-995
Date PublishedDEC
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0368-2315
Mots-clésAdenosis, Atypical ductal neoplasia, Flat epithelial atypia, High-risk breast lesion, lobular neoplasia, Papillary breast lesions, Radial scar, Sclerosing adenosis
Résumé

In the last few years, diagnostics of high-risk breast lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia [ADH], flat epithelial atypia [FEA], lobular neoplasia: atypical lobular hyperplasia [ALH], Lobular carcinoma in situ [LCIS], radial scar [RS], usual ductal hyperplasia [UDH], adenosis, sclerosing adenosis [SA], papillary breast lesions, mucocele-like lesion [MLL]) have increased with the growing number of breast percutaneous biopsies. The management of these lesions is highly conditioned by the enlarged risk of breast cancer combined with either an increased probability of finding cancer after surgery, either a possible malignant transformation (in situ or invasive cancer), or an increased probability of developing cancer on the long range. An overview of the literature reports grade C recommendations concerning the management and follow-up of these lesions: in case of ADH, FEA, ALH, LCIS, RS, MLL with atypia, diagnosed on percutaneous biospies: surgical excision is recommended; in case of a diagnostic based on vacuum-assisted core biopsy with complete disappearance of radiological signal for FEA or RS without atypia: surgical abstention is a valid alternative approved by multidisciplinary meeting. In case of ALH (incidental finding) associated with benign lesion responsible of radiological signal: abstention may be proposed; in case of UDH, adenosis, MLL without atypia, diagnosed on percutaneous biopsies: the concordance of radiology and histopathology findings must be ensured. No data is available to recommend surgery; in case of non-in sano resection for ADH, FEA, ALH, LCIS (except pleomorphic type), RS, MLL: surgery does not seem to be necessary; in case of previous ADH, ALH, LCIS: a specific follow-up is recommended in accordance with HAS's recommendations. In case of FEA and RS or MLL combined with atypia, little data are yet available to differ the management from others lesions with atypia; in case of UDH, usual sclerosing adenosis, RS without atypia, fibro cystic disease: no specific follow-up is recommended in agreement with HAS's recommendations. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.037