Treatment and outcomes in patients with central nervous system metastases from breast cancer in the real-life ESME MBC cohort

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreTreatment and outcomes in patients with central nervous system metastases from breast cancer in the real-life ESME MBC cohort
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuteursPasquier D, Darlix A, Louvel G, Fraisse J, Jacot W, Brain E, Petit A, Mouret-Reynier MAnge, Goncalves A, Dalenc F, Deluche E, Fresnel JSebastien, Augereau P, Ferrero JMarc, Geffrelot J, Fumet J-D, Lecouillard I, Cottu P, Petit T, Uwer L, Jouannaud C, Leheurteur M, Dieras V, Robain M, Mouttet-Audouard R, Bachelot T, Courtinard C
JournalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume125
Pagination22-30
Date PublishedJAN
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0959-8049
Mots-clésbrain metastases, Metastatic breast cancer, Neurological progression-free survival
Résumé

Aim: The aims of the present study were to describe treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with central nervous system metastases (CNSM) selected among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients included in a retrospective study from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC cohort. Methods: Neurological progression-free survival (NPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplane-Meier method. Significant contributors to NPFS were determined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Results: After a median follow-up of 42.8 months, of 16 701 patients included in the ESME MBC database, CNSM were diagnosed in 24.6% of patients. The most frequent treatments after diagnosis of CNSM were whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (45.2%) and systemic treatment (59.3%). Median OS and NPFS were 7.9 months (95% CI: 7.2-8.4) and 5.5 months (95% CI: 5.2-5.8), respectively. In multivariate analysis, age >70 years (vs <50 years; HR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.24-1.57), triple-negative tumours (vs HER2-/HR+; HR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.71 -2.06), HER2+/HR-tumours (vs HER2-/HR+; HR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.02-1.27), >= 3 metastatic sites (vs < 3; HR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.21-1.43) and >= 3 previous treatment lines (vs < 3; HR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.56-1.96) were detrimental for NPFS. A time interval between selection and CNSM diagnosis superior to 18 months (vs <9 months; HR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78-0.98) was associated with longer NPFS. Conclusions: This study describes current treatment patterns of MBC patients in a ``real life'' setting. Despite advances in stereotactic radiation therapy, most of the patients still received WBRT. More research is warranted to identify patient subsets for tailored treatment strategies. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1016/j.ejca.2019.11.001