Clinical Relevance of EGFR- or KRAS-mutated Subclones in Patients With Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Receiving Erlotinib in a French Prospective Cohort (IFCT ERMETIC2 Cohort - Part 2)

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreClinical Relevance of EGFR- or KRAS-mutated Subclones in Patients With Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Receiving Erlotinib in a French Prospective Cohort (IFCT ERMETIC2 Cohort - Part 2)
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuteursBeau-Faller M, Texier M, Blons H, Richard N, Escande F, Melaabi S, Lizard S, Ont FDc Frai, Longchampt E, Morin F, Zalcman G, Pignon J-P, Cadranel J
JournalCLINICAL LUNG CANCER
Volume20
Pagination222-230
Date PublishedMAY
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1525-7304
Mots-clésDriver mutations, Molecular techniques, NSCLC, Sensitivity, Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Résumé

Detecting driver mutations belongs now to the best practices in advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. New molecular techniques are highly sensitive. In non-small-cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib (n = 228), we report that EGFR- and KRAS-mutated subclones had a prognostic value, but not minor KRAS-mutated subclones. Molecular techniques must be sensitive but not under 1% of mutated tumor cells. Introduction: Evaluation of EGFR Mutation status for the administration of EGFR-TKIs in non-small cell lung Carcinoma (ERMETIC) was a prospective study designed to validate the prognostic value of EGFR/KRAS mutations in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), all receiving a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib. ERMETIC2 was an ancillary project evaluating the clinical value of common EGFR/KRAS-mutated subclones regarding prognosis using highly sensitive molecular detection methods. Materials and Methods: Tumor samples from 228 patients with NSCLC (59% adenocarcinoma, 37% women, and 19% never/former smokers) were available for reanalysis using alternative highly sensitive molecular techniques. A multivariate Cox model was used for prognostic analysis. Results: Using alternative highly sensitive techniques, 16 EGFR and 51 KRAS supplementary mutations were newly identified, all still exclusive, leading to an overall rate of 12.3% (n = 28) and 33.3% (n = 76), respectively. Using real-time polymerase chain reaction (hybridization probe), they were significantly associated with progression-free survival (P = .02)and overall survival (OS) (P = .01), which were better for EGFR-mutated patients for progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.78) and OS (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.31-1), and worse for KRAS mutations and OS (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.09-2.44). Using the most sensitive technique detection for KRAS-clamp polymerase chain reaction-KRAS mutated subclones did not impact OS. Conclusions: KRAS and EGFR mutations were detected in higher proportions by alternative highly sensitive molecular techniques compared with direct Sanger sequencing. However, minor KRAS-mutated subclones offered no prognostic value when representing less than 1% of the tumor cells. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc.

DOI10.1016/j.cllc.2018.12.012