Multicenter validation of the flow measurement of classical monocyte fraction for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia diagnosis
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Multicenter validation of the flow measurement of classical monocyte fraction for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia diagnosis |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2018 |
Auteurs | Tarfi S, Harrivel V, Dumezy F, Guy J, Roussel M, Mimoun A, Fenaux P, Chapuis N, Solary E, Selimoglu-Buet D, Wagner-Ballon O, GFM |
Journal | BLOOD CANCER JOURNAL |
Volume | 8 |
Pagination | 114 |
Date Published | NOV 14 |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 2044-5385 |
Résumé | Peripheral blood monocytes include three subsets defined by CD14 and CD16 surface markers. An increase in the CD14(++)CD16(-) classical monocyte fraction >= 94% of the total monocytes was proposed to rapidly and efficiently distinguish chronic myelomonocytic leukemia from reactive monocytosis. The robustness of this assay required a multicenter validation. The flow cytometry assay designed to quantify peripheral blood monocyte subsets was implemented by multiple diagnosis laboratories in France. A nationwide survey was performed to evaluate its performance. All the 48 French laboratories answered the questionnaire, revealing that 63% use this assay routinely. Central blind reanalysis of 329 cytometry files collected from five laboratories demonstrated an excellent correlation in classical monocyte fraction measurement (r = 0.93; p < 0.0001). The cutoff value of 94% classical monocytes being the critical readout for diagnosis, we then compared 115 patients with classical monocytes = 94% and 214 patients with a fraction < 94% between initial analysis and reanalysis. An agreement was obtained in 311 files. Finally, an overt diagnosis, available for 86 files, confirmed a good sensitivity (93.6%) and specificity (89.7%). This survey demonstrates the robustness of the flow assay with limited variability of classical monocyte percentage between centers, validates the 94% cutoff value, and confirms its sensitivity and specificity. |
DOI | 10.1038/s41408-018-0146-8 |