Letrozole and palbociclib versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy of high-risk luminal breast cancer

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreLetrozole and palbociclib versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy of high-risk luminal breast cancer
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuteursCottu P., D'Hondt V., Dureau S., Lerebours F., Desmoulins I., Heudel P-E, Duhoux F.P, Levy C., Mouret-Reynier M-A, Dalenc F., Frenel J-S, Jouannaud C., Venat-Bouvet L., Nguyen S., Ferrero J-M, Canon J-L, Grenier J., Callens C., Gentien D., Lemonnier J., Vincent-Salomon A., Delaloge S.
JournalANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume29
Pagination2334-2340
Date PublishedDEC
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0923-7534
Mots-clésLuminal breast cancer, Neoadjuvant, palbociclib, PAM50
Résumé

Palbociclib is a CDK4/6 inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy and safety in combination with endocrine therapy in advanced luminal breast cancer (LBC). We evaluated the respective efficacy and safety of chemotherapy and letrozole-palbociclib (LETPAL) combination as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with high-risk LBC. NeoPAL (UCBG10/4, NCT02400567) is a randomised, parallel, non-comparative phase II study. Patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, Prosigna(A (R))-defined luminal B, or luminal A and node-positive, stage II-III breast cancer, not candidate for breast-conserving surgery, were randomly assigned to either letrozole (2.5 mg daily) and palbociclib (125 mg daily, 3 weeks/4) during 19 weeks, or to FEC100 (5FU 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2))x3 21-day courses followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m(2)x3 21-day courses. Primary end point was residual cancer burden (RCB 0-I rate). Secondary end points included clinical response, proliferation-based markers, and safety. Overall, 106 patients were randomised [median Prosigna(A (R)) ROR Score 71 (22-93)]. RCB 0-I was observed in four and eight patients in LETPAL [7.7% (95% CI 0.4-14.9)] and chemotherapy [15.7% (95% CI 5.7-25.7)] arms, respectively. Pathological complete response rates were 3.8% and 5.9%. Clinical response (75%) and breast-conserving surgery rates (69%) were similar in both arms. Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index 0 scores (breast cancer-specific survival) were observed in 17.6% and 8.0% of patients in LETPAL and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Safety profile was as expected, with 2 versus 17 serious adverse events (including 11 grade 4 serious AEs in the chemotherapy arm). LETPAL combination was associated with poor pathological response but encouraging clinical and biomarker responses in Prosigna(A (R))-defined high-risk LBC. Contemporary chemotherapy regimen was associated with poor pathological and biomarker responses, with a much less favourable safety profile. LETPAL combination might represent an alternative to chemotherapy in early high-risk LBC. NCT02400567.

DOI10.1093/annonc/mdy448