Sentinel lymph node biopsy validation for large tumors

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreSentinel lymph node biopsy validation for large tumors
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuteursHouvenaeghel G, Quilichini O, Cohen M, Reyal F, Classe J-M, Mazouni C, Giard S, Carrabin N, Charitansky H, Darai E, Hudry D, Azuar P, Villet R, Gimbergues P, Tunon-DE-Lara C, Lambaudie E
JournalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume48
Pagination275-280
Date PublishedDEC
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1743-9191
Mots-clésBreast cancer, Large tumors, Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Résumé

{Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) remains under discussion for large size tumors. The aim of this work has been to study the false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB for large tumors and predictive factors of false negative (FN). Materials and methods: A study of a multicentric cohort, involved patients presenting N0 breast cancer with a SLNB eventually completed by complementary axillary lymph node dissection (cALND). The main criteria were the FNR and the predictive factors of FN. Results: 12.415 patients were included: 748 with tumors >= 30 mm, 1101 with tumors> 20 and < 30 mm and 10.566 with tumors <= 20 mm, with a cALND respectively for 501 patients (67%), 523 (62.1%) and 2775 (26.3%). The FNR were respectively: 3.05% (IC95%: 1.3-4.8) for tumors >= 30 mm(star), 3.5% (1.8-5.2) for tumors> 20 and < 30 mm(star), 1.8% (1-2.4) for tumors <= 20 mm (p < 0.05) ((star) Not significant). At multivariate analysis, SN number harvested <= 2 (OR: 2.0

DOI10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.077