Optimal duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk node-negative (N-) breast cancer patients: 6-year results of the prospective randomised multicentre phase III UNICANCER-PACS 05 trial (UCBG-0106)

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreOptimal duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk node-negative (N-) breast cancer patients: 6-year results of the prospective randomised multicentre phase III UNICANCER-PACS 05 trial (UCBG-0106)
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuteursKerbrat P, Desmoulins I, Roca L, Levy C, Lortholary A, Marre A, Delva R, Rios M, Viens P, Brain E, Serin D, Edel M, Debled M, Campone M, Mourret-Reynier M-A, Bachelot T, Foucher-Goudier M-J, Asselain B, Lemonnier J, Martin A-L, Roche H
JournalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume79
Pagination166-175
Date PublishedJUL
Type of ArticleArticle; Proceedings Paper
ISSN0959-8049
Mots-clésAdjuvant chemotherapy, Breast cancer, Chemotherapy duration, FEC 100, High-risk patients, Node-negative
Résumé

{Purpose: Optimal duration of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer remained to be investigated rigorously for the standard regimens in widespread use in North America (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, AC) and Europe (5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, FEC). Whether six cycles of FEC 100 present an advantage, or not, compared with only four cycles was tested directly in a phase III prospective multicentre trial. Patients and methods: Between 2002 and 2006, 1515 women between 18 and 65 degrees years of age, with node negative N(-) high-risk early-stage breast cancer, were included in the study following breast surgery and axillary lymph node dissection or procedure by sentinel node technique. Inclusion in the study required tumour size T >= 1 cm and at least one of the high-risk factors: T > 2 cm, negative oestrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER- and PR-), Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grade II or III and age <= 35 degrees years. Patients were randomly assigned to either six FEC 100 (Arm A) or four FEC 100 (Arm B). The trial was powered to detect an absolute difference >= 6% in disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 degrees years. Results: At 6.1 degrees years median follow-up, with 91 (12%) events recorded in Arm A versus 106 (14%) in Arm B, no statistically significant risk increase was associated with four versus six FEC 100: DFS (hazard ratio (HR) Z 1.18; CI 95% [0.89-1.56]

DOI10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.004