On the Optimization of a Multimodal Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvester Using Mode Localization and Nonlinear Dynamics
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | On the Optimization of a Multimodal Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvester Using Mode Localization and Nonlinear Dynamics |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2021 |
Auteurs | Aouali K, Kacem N, Bouhaddi N, Haddar M |
Journal | ACTUATORS |
Volume | 10 |
Pagination | 25 |
Date Published | FEB |
Type of Article | Article |
Mots-clés | electromagnetic vibration energy harvester, Energy localization, multimodal structure, multiobjective optimization, nonlinear dynamics |
Résumé | In this paper we study a generic model of a nonlinear quasiperiodic vibration energy harvester (VEH) based on electromagnetic transduction. The proposed device consists of multiple moving magnets guided by elastic beams and coupled by repulsive magnetic forces. A system of two degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) with tunable nonlinearity and mode localization is experimentally validated. The validated 2-DOFs harvester is optimized using a multiobjective optimization procedure to improve its harvested power and frequency bandwidth. An efficient criterion using the modal kinetic energy of the finite element model is proposed to quantify the energy localized in the structure perturbed zones. Afterward, this concept has been generalized to a 5-DOFs VEH with two perturbed DOFs oscillators and the optimal performances are derived using a multiobjective optimization. This proposed model enables a significant increase in the harvested power and frequency bandwidth by 101% and 79%, respectively, compared to that of the 2-DOFs device. Moreover, it has been shown that harvesting energy from two perturbed magnets among five provides almost the same amount of harvested energy and enhances the frequency bandwidth by 18% compared to those of the periodic system. Consequently, the harvester can be improved by reducing the transduction circuits number and the manufacturing cost. |
DOI | 10.3390/act10020025 |