Design and Rationale of the Swiss-Apero Randomized Clinical Trial: Comparison of Amplatzer Amulet vs Watchman Device in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreDesign and Rationale of the Swiss-Apero Randomized Clinical Trial: Comparison of Amplatzer Amulet vs Watchman Device in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuteursGalea R, De Marco F, Aminian A, Meneveau N, Anselme F, Grani C, Huber AT, Teiger E, Iriart X, Angelillis M, Brugger N, Spirito A, Corpataux N, Franzone A, Vranckx P, Fischer U, Pedrazzini G, Bedogni F, Windecker S, Raber L, Valgimigli M
JournalJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume14
Pagination930-940
Date PublishedOCT
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1937-5387
Mots-clésAmulet, Cardiac computed tomography angiography, Left atrial appendage closure, Randomized clinical trial, Watchman, Watchman FLX
Résumé

Residual or newly acquired leaks are routinely appraised after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). The Watchman and the Amulet are the two most frequently used devices for LAAC but no randomized study has so far assessed their comparative leak rates after intervention. The ``Comparison of Amplatzer Amulet vs Watchman devices in patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure'' (Swiss-Apero, NCT03399851) is an academic-sponsored multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing Amulet versus Watchman/FLX devices among patients undergoing a clinically indicated LAAC. The study is designed to assess the superiority of Amulet vs. Watchman/FLX in terms of leaks detected by cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) at 45 days (primary endpoint) and 13 months (secondary endpoint) after intervention by an imaging Core Laboratory. The Swiss-Apero study is the first randomized clinical trial comparing Amulet and Watchman/FLX with respect to the prevalence of post-procedural leak as assessed with CCTA.

DOI10.1007/s12265-020-10095-4