Urtica dioica extracts abolish scopolamine-induced neuropathies in rats

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreUrtica dioica extracts abolish scopolamine-induced neuropathies in rats
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuteursAlmaaty AHAbu, Mosaad RM, Hassan MK, Ali EHA, Mahmoud GA, Ahmed H, Anber N, Alkahtani S, Abdel-Daim MM, Aleya L, Hammad S
JournalENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume28
Pagination18134-18145
Date PublishedAPR
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0944-1344
Mots-clésAlzheimer-like phenotype, Monoamines, Neuroinflammation, Oxidative stress, Spatial memory
Résumé

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by alterations in monoamines, oxidative stress, and metabolic dysfunctions. We aim to assess the therapeutic impacts of roots or leaf extract from Urtica dioica (UD; stinging nettle) against scopolamine (SCOP)-induced memory dysfunction, amnesia, and oxidative stress in rats. Spatial memory was assessed by Y maze test. Tissue analyses of norepinephrine (NE), dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-HT), malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), glutathione (GSH, GSSG), AMP, ADP, and ATP were assessed by HPLC. mRNA levels of Tau and Hsp70 were estimated by PCR. UD extracts particularly nettle root (NR) significantly normalized the SCOP-induced memory deficits even more potent than sermion (SR) and donepezil (DON). Similarly, NR had potent therapeutic impacts on the levels of cortical and hippocampal monoamines e.g. DA, NE, and 5-HT. SCOP induced a dramatic oxidative stress as measured by MDA, NO, and GSSG levels; however, UD extracts showed significant anti-oxidative stress impacts. Additionally, UD extracts restored ATP levels and reduced the levels of AMP and ADP compared to SCOP-treated rats. Furthermore, cortical Tau and hippocampal Hsp70 were modulated by UD extracts particularly NR compared to the SCOP group. In conclusion, UD extracts particularly roots have potential therapeutic impacts against SCOP-induced neuroinflammatory and/or Alzheimer-like phenotype in rats.

DOI10.1007/s11356-020-12025-y