A novel kinematic detection of foot-strike and toe-off events during noninstrumented treadmill running to estimate contact time
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | A novel kinematic detection of foot-strike and toe-off events during noninstrumented treadmill running to estimate contact time |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2021 |
Auteurs | Patoz A, Lussiana T, Gindre C, Malatesta D |
Journal | JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS |
Volume | 128 |
Pagination | 110737 |
Date Published | NOV 9 |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 0021-9290 |
Mots-clés | event detection, Forefoot running, Gait analysis, Gait events, Midfoot running, Rearfoot running |
Résumé | Contact time (t(c)) relies upon the accuracy of foot-strike and toe-off events, for which ground reaction force (GRF) is the gold standard. However, force plates are not always available, e.g., when running on a noninstrumented treadmill. In this situation, a kinematic algorithm (KA) - an algorithm based on motion capture data - might be used if it performs equally for all foot-strike angles across speeds. The purpose of this study was to propose a novel KA, using a combination of heel and toe kinematics (three markers per foot), to detect foot-strike and toe -off and compare it to GRF at different speeds and across foot-strike angles. One hundred runners ran at 9 km/h, 11 km/h, and 13 km/h. Force data and whole-body kinematic data were acquired by an instrumented treadmill and optoelectronic system. Foot-strike and toe-off showed small systematic biases between GRF and KA at all speeds (<= 5 ms), except toe-off at 11 km/h (no bias). The root mean square error (RMSE) was <= 9 ms and was mostly constant across foot-strike angles for toe-off (7.4 ms) but not for foot-strike (4.1-11.1 ms). Small sys-tematic biases (<= 8 ms) and significant differences (P < 0.01) were reported for tc at all speeds, and the RMSE was <= 14 ms (<= 5%). The RMSE for tc increased with increasing foot-strike angle (3.5-5.4%). Nonetheless, this novel KA computed smaller errors than existing methods for foot-strike, toe-off, and t(c). Therefore, this study supports the use of this novel KA to accurately estimate foot-strike, toe-off, and tc from kinematic data obtained during noninstrumented treadmill running independent of the foot-strike angle. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110737 |