The Effect of Quadriceps Muscle Length on Maximum Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Evoked Contraction, Muscle Architecture, and Tendon-Aponeurosis Stiffness

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreThe Effect of Quadriceps Muscle Length on Maximum Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Evoked Contraction, Muscle Architecture, and Tendon-Aponeurosis Stiffness
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuteursCavalcante JGalvao Ten, Marqueti Rde Cassia, Geremia JMarcel, Neto IVieira de, Baroni BManfredini, Silbernagel KGravare, Bottaro M, Babault N, Durigan JLuiz Quagl
JournalFRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
Volume12
Pagination633589
Date PublishedMAR 29
Type of ArticleArticle
Mots-clésexercise physiology, moment-angle relationship, muscle architecture, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, tendon-aponeurosis complex
Résumé

Muscle-tendon unit length plays a crucial role in quadriceps femoris muscle (QF) physiological adaptation, but the influence of hip and knee angles during QF neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is poorly investigated. We investigated the effect of muscle length on maximum electrically induced contraction (MEIC) and current efficiency. We secondarily assessed the architecture of all QF constituents and their tendon-aponeurosis complex (TAC) displacement to calculate a stiffness index. This study was a randomized, repeated measure, blinded design with a sample of twenty healthy men aged 24.0 +/- 4.6. The MEIC was assessed in four different positions: supine with knee flexion of 60 degrees (SUP60); seated with knee flexion of 60 degrees (SIT60); supine with knee flexion of 20 degrees (SUP20), and seated with knee flexion of 20 degrees (SIT20). The current efficiency (MEIC/maximum tolerated current amplitude) was calculated. Ultrasonography of the QF was performed at rest and during NMES to measure pennation angle (theta(p)) and fascicle length (L-f), and the TAC stiffness index. MEIC and current efficiency were greater for SUP60 and SIT60 compared to SUP20 and SIT20. The vastus lateralis and medialis showed lower theta(p) and higher L-f at SUP60 and SIT60, while for the rectus femoris, in SUP60 there were lower theta(p) and higher L-f than in all positions. The vastus intermedius had a similar pattern to the other vastii, except for lack of difference in theta(p) between SIT60 compared to SUP20 and SIT20. The TAC stiffness index was greater for SUP60. We concluded that NMES generate greater torque and current efficiency at 60 degrees of knee flexion, compared to 20 degrees. For these knee angles, lengthening the QF at the hip did not promote significant change. Each QF constituent demonstrated muscle physiology patterns according to hip and/or knee angles, even though a greater L-f and lower theta(p) were predominant in SUP60 and SIT60. QF TAC index stiffened in more elongated positions, which probably contributed to enhanced force transmission and slightly higher torque in SUP60. Our findings may help exercise physiologist better understand the impact of hip and knee angles on designing more rational NMES stimulation strategies.

DOI10.3389/fphys.2021.633589