Astrophysics Milestones for Pulsar Timing Array Gravitational-wave Detection

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreAstrophysics Milestones for Pulsar Timing Array Gravitational-wave Detection
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuteursPol NS, Taylor SR, Kelley LZoltan, Vigeland SJ, Simon J, Chen S, Arzoumanian Z, Baker PT, Becsy B, Brazier A, Brook PR, Burke-Spolaor S, Chatterjee S, Cordes JM, Cornish NJ, Crawford F, H. Cromartie T, DeCesar ME, Demorest PB, Dolch T, Ferrara EC, Fiore W, Fonseca E, Garver-Daniels N, Good DC, Hazboun JS, Jennings RJ, Jones ML, Kaiser AR, Kaplan DL, Key JShapiro, Lam MT, T. Lazio JW, Luo J, Lynch RS, Madison DR, McEwen A, McLaughlin MA, Mingarelli CMF, Ng C, Nice DJ, Pennucci TT, Ransom SM, Ray PS, Shapiro-Albert BJ, Siemens X, Stairs IH, Stinebring DR, Swiggum JK, Vallisneri M, Wahl H, Witt CA, Collaboration NANOG
JournalASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume911
PaginationL34
Date PublishedAPR
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN2041-8205
Résumé

The NANOGrav Collaboration reported strong Bayesian evidence for a common-spectrum stochastic process in its 12.5 yr pulsar timing array data set, with median characteristic strain amplitude at periods of a year of. However, evidence for the quadrupolar Hellings & Downs interpulsar correlations, which are characteristic of gravitational-wave signals, was not yet significant. We emulate and extend the NANOGrav data set, injecting a wide range of stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB) signals that encompass a variety of amplitudes and spectral shapes, and quantify three key milestones. (I) Given the amplitude measured in the 12.5 yr analysis and assuming this signal is a GWB, we expect to accumulate robust evidence of an interpulsar-correlated GWB signal with 15-17 yr of data, i.e., an additional 2-5 yr from the 12.5 yr data set. (II) At the initial detection, we expect a fractional uncertainty of 40% on the power-law strain spectrum slope, which is sufficient to distinguish a GWB of supermassive black hole binary origin from some models predicting more exotic origins. (III) Similarly, the measured GWB amplitude will have an uncertainty of 44% upon initial detection, allowing us to arbitrate between some population models of supermassive black hole binaries. In addition, power-law models are distinguishable from those having low-frequency spectral turnovers once 20 yr of data are reached. Even though our study is based on the NANOGrav data, we also derive relations that allow for a generalization to other pulsar timing array data sets. Most notably, by combining the data of individual arrays into the International Pulsar Timing Array, all of these milestones can be reached significantly earlier.

DOI10.3847/2041-8213/abf2c9