Is Curfew Effective in Limiting SARS-CoV-2 Progression? An Evaluation in France Based on Epidemiokinetic Analyses

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreIs Curfew Effective in Limiting SARS-CoV-2 Progression? An Evaluation in France Based on Epidemiokinetic Analyses
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuteursMegarbane B, Bourasset F, Scherrmann J-M
JournalJOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume36
Pagination2731-2738
Date PublishedSEP
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0884-8734
Mots-clésCOVID-19, curfew, Epidemic, Lockdown, Modeling, SARS-CoV-2
Résumé

BACKGROUND: Since late summer 2020, the French authorities implemented a curfew/lightened lockdown-alternating strategy instead of strict lockdown, to improve acceptability and limit socioeconomic consequences. However, data on curfew-related efficacy to control the epidemic are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects on COVID-19 spread in France of curfew combined to local and/or nationwide restrictions from late summer 2020 to mid-February 2021. DESIGN: We conducted a comparative evaluation using a susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR)-based model completed with epidemiokinetic tools. MAIN MEASURES: We analyzed the time-course of epidemic progression rate under curfew in French Guyana and five metropolitan regions where additional restrictions were implemented at different times. Using linear regressions of the decay/increase rates in daily contaminations, we calculated the epidemic regression half-lives (t(1/2 beta)) for each identified period. KEY RESULTS: In French Guyana, two decay periods with rapid regression (t(1/2 beta) of similar to 10 days) were observed under curfew, with slowing (t(1/2 beta) of similar to 43 days) when curfew was lightened. During the 2-week pre-lockdown curfew (2020/10/17-2020/11/02) in Provence-Alpes-Coted'Azur, Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes, and Ile-de-France, the epidemic progression was unchanged. During the post-lockdown curfew (2020/12/15-2020/02/14), the epidemic slowly regressed in Grand-Est (t(1/2 beta) of similar to 37 days), whereas its progression rate plateaued in Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes and increased immediately in Provence-Alpes-Cote-d'Azur, Ile-de-France, and Nouvelle-Aquitaine, whatever the curfew starting time was (06:00 or 08:00 pm). Interestingly, a delayed slow decay (17 days < t(1/2 beta) < 64 days) occurred under curfew in all regions except Ile-de-France. CONCLUSIONS: Curfew allowed the temporary control of SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, however variably in the French regions, without preventing lockdown necessity. To accelerate the epidemic regression such as observed in French Guyana, curfew should be implemented timely with additional restrictions.

DOI10.1007/s11606-021-06953-9