Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with hepatic angiomyolipoma: A literature review

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreClinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with hepatic angiomyolipoma: A literature review
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuteursCalame P, Tyrode G, Verhoeven DWeil, Felix S, Klompenhouwer AJulia, Di Martino V, Delabrousse E, Thevenot T
JournalWORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume27
Pagination2299-2311
Date PublishedMAY 21
Type of ArticleReview
ISSN1007-9327
Mots-clésangiomyolipoma, Imaging, Liver, Pathology, Potentially malignant, Tuberous sclerosis complex
Résumé

First reported in 1976, hepatic angiomyolipoma (HAML) is a rare mesenchymal liver tumor occurring mostly in middle-aged women. Diagnosis of the liver mass is often incidental on abdominal imaging due to the frequent absence of specific symptoms. Nearly 10% of HAMLs are associated with tuberous sclerosis complex. HAML contains variable proportions of blood vessels, smooth muscle cells and adipose tissue, which renders radiological diagnosis hazardous. Cells express positivity for HMB-45 and actin, thus these tumors are integrated into the group of perivascular epithelioid cell tumors. Typically, a HAML appears on magnetic resonance imaging (or computed tomography scan) as a hypervascular solid tumor with fatty areas and with washout, and can easily be misdiagnosed as other liver tumors, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma. The therapeutic strategy is not clearly defined, but surgical resection is indicated for symptomatic patients, for tumors showing an aggressive pattern (i.e., changes in size on imaging or high proliferation activity and atypical epithelioid pattern on liver biopsy), for large (> 5 cm) biopsy-proven HAML, and if doubts remain on imaging or histology. Conservative management may be justified in other conditions, since most cases follow a benign clinical course. In summary, the correct diagnosis of HAML is challenging on imaging and relies mainly on pathological findings.

DOI10.3748/wjg.v27.i19.2299