Impact of Systematic Whole-body F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT on the Management of Patients Suspected of Infective Endocarditis: The Prospective Multicenter TEPvENDO Study
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Impact of Systematic Whole-body F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT on the Management of Patients Suspected of Infective Endocarditis: The Prospective Multicenter TEPvENDO Study |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2021 |
Auteurs | Duval X, Le Moing V, Tubiana S, Esposito-Farese M, Ilic-Habensus E, Leclercq F, Bourdon A, Goehringer F, Selton-Suty C, Chevalier E, Boutoille D, Piriou N, Le Tourneau T, Chirouze C, Seronde M-F, Morel O, Piroth L, Eicher J-C, Humbert O, Revest M, Thebault E, Devillers A, Delahaye F, Boibieux A, Gregoire B, Hoen B, Laouenan C, Iung B, Rouzet F, Grp AEPEI-TEPENDOStudy |
Journal | CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES |
Volume | 73 |
Pagination | 393-403 |
Date Published | AUG 1 |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 1058-4838 |
Mots-clés | diagnostic impact, F-18-FDG-PET/CT, Infective endocarditis, patient management |
Résumé | Background. Diagnostic and patients' management modifications induced by whole-body F-18-FDG-PET/CT had not been evaluated so far in prosthetic valve (PV) or native valve (NV) infective endocarditis (IE)-suspected patients. Methods. In sum, 140 consecutive patients in 8 tertiary care hospitals underwent F-18-FDG-PET/CT. ESC-2015-modified Duke criteria and patients' management plan were established jointly by 2 experts before F-18-FDG-PET/CT. The same experts reestablished Duke classification and patients' management plan immediately after qualitative interpretation of F-18-FDG-PET/CT. A 6-month final Duke classification was established. Results. Among the 70 PV and 70 NV patients, 34 and 46 were classified as definite IE before F-18-FDG-PET/CT. Abnormal perivalvular F-18-FDG uptake was recorded in 67.2% PV and 24.3% NV patients respectively (P < .001) and extracardiac uptake in 44.3% PV and 51.4% NV patients. IE classification was modified in 24.3% and 5.7% patients (P = .005) (net reclassification index 20% and 4.3%). Patients' managements were modified in 21.4% PV and 31.4% NV patients (P = .25). It was mainly due to perivalvular uptake in PV patients and to extra-cardiac uptake in NV patients and consisted in surgery plan modifications in 7 patients, antibiotic plan modifications in 22 patients and both in 5 patients. Altogether, F-18-FDG-PET/CT modified classification and/or care in 40% of the patients (95% confidence interval: 32-48), which was most likely to occur in those with a noncontributing echocardiography (P < .001) or IE classified as possible at baseline (P = .04), while there was no difference between NV and PV. Conclusions. Systematic F-18-FDG-PET/CT did significantly and appropriately impact diagnostic classification and/or IE management in PV and NV-IE suspected patients. |
DOI | 10.1093/cid/ciaa666 |