Pulse Wave Transit Time Measurements of Cardiac Output in Septic Shock Patients: A Comparison of the Estimated Continuous Cardiac Output System with Transthoracic Echocardiography

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitrePulse Wave Transit Time Measurements of Cardiac Output in Septic Shock Patients: A Comparison of the Estimated Continuous Cardiac Output System with Transthoracic Echocardiography
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuteursFeissel M, Aho LSerge, Georgiev S, Tapponnier R, Badie J, Bruyere R, Quenot J-P
JournalPLOS ONE
Volume10
Paginatione0130489
Date PublishedJUN 30
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1932-6203
Résumé

Background We determined reliability of cardiac output (CO) measured by pulse wave transit time cardiac output system (esCCO system; COesCCO) vs transthoracic echocardiography (COTTE) in mechanically ventilated patients in the early phase of septic shock. A secondary objective was to assess ability of esCCO to detect change in CO after fluid infusion. Methods Mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the ICU, aged > 18 years, in sinus rhythm, in the early phase of septic shock were prospectively included. We performed fluid infusion of 500ml of crystalloid solution over 20 minutes and recorded CO by EsCCO and TTE immediately before (T0) and 5 minutes after (T1) fluid administration. Patients were divided into 2 groups (responders and non-responders) according to a threshold of 15% increase in COTTE in response to volume expansion. Results In total, 25 patients were included, average 64 +/- 15 years, 15 (60%) were men. Average SAPSII and SOFA scores were 55 +/- 21.3 and 13 +/- 2, respectively. ICU mortality was 36%. Mean cardiac output at T0 was 5.8 +/- 1.35 L/min by esCCO and 5.27 +/- 1.17 L/min by COTTE. At T1, respective values were 6.63 +/- 1.57 L/min for esCCO and 6.10 +/- 1.29 L/min for COTTE. Overall, 12 patients were classified as responders, 13 as non-responders by the reference method. A threshold of 11% increase in COesCCO was found to discriminate responders from non-responders with a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI, 0.52-0.98) and a specificity of 77% (95% CI, 0.46-0.95). Conclusion We show strong correlation esCCO and echocardiography for measuring CO, and change in CO after fluid infusion in ICU patients.

DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0130489