Effect of opioid-free anaesthesia on post-operative period in cardiac surgery: a retrospective matched case-control study

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreEffect of opioid-free anaesthesia on post-operative period in cardiac surgery: a retrospective matched case-control study
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuteursGuinot P-G, Spitz A, Berthoud V, Ellouze O, Missaoui A, Constandache T, Grosjean S, Radhouani M, Anciaux J-B, Parthiot J-P, Merle J-P, Nowobilski N, Nguyen M, Bouhemad B
JournalBMC ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume19
Pagination136
Date PublishedJUL 31
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1471-2253
Mots-clésAnesthetics, Cardiac surgery, intravenous, Lidocaine, Opioid, outcomes, propofol
Résumé

{BackgroundNo study has been conducted to demonstrate the feasibility of an opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) protocol in cardiac surgery to improve patient care. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of OFA on post-operative morphine consumption and the post-operative course.MethodsAfter retrospectively registering to clinicaltrial.gov (NCT03816592), we performed a retrospective matched cohort study (1:1) on cardiac surgery patients with cardiopulmonary bypass between 2018 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: OFA (lidocaine, dexamethasone and ketamine) or opioid anaesthesia (OA) (sufentanil). The main outcome was the total postoperative morphine consumption in the 48h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were rescue analgesic use, a major adverse event composite endpoint, and ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS).ResultsOne hundred ten patients were matched (OFA: n=55; OA: n=55). On inclusion, demographic and surgical data for the OFA and OA groups were comparable. The total morphine consumption was higher in the OA group than in the OFA group (15 (6-34) vs 5mg (2-18)

DOI10.1186/s12871-019-0802-y