Five-Year Survival in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction According to Modalities of Reperfusion Therapy The French Registry on Acute ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 Cohort
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Five-Year Survival in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction According to Modalities of Reperfusion Therapy The French Registry on Acute ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 Cohort |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2014 |
Auteurs | Danchin N, Puymirat E, Steg PGabriel, Goldstein P, Schiele F, Belle L, Fajadet J, Khalife K, Coste P, Ferrieres J, Simon T, Investigators FAST-MI2005 |
Journal | CIRCULATION |
Volume | 129 |
Pagination | 1629-1636 |
Date Published | APR 22 |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 0009-7322 |
Mots-clés | Myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, pharmacologic actions, time |
Résumé | Background Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred reperfusion method for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, it remains difficult to implement in many areas, and fibrinolytic therapy is still widely used. Methods and Results We assessed 5-year mortality in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction from the French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 according to use and type of reperfusion therapy. Of 1492 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with a first call 12 hours from onset, 447 (30%) received fibrinolysis (66% prehospital; 97% with subsequent angiography, 84% with subsequent PCI), 583 (39%) had pPCI, and 462 (31%) received no reperfusion. Crude 5-year survival was 88% for the fibrinolytic-based strategy, 83% for pPCI, and 59% for no reperfusion. Adjusted hazard ratios for 5-year death were 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.50-1.06) for fibrinolysis versus pPCI, 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.88) for prehospital fibrinolysis versus pPCI, and 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.91) for fibrinolysis versus pPCI beyond 90 minutes of call in patients having called 180 minutes from onset. In propensity score-matched populations, however, survival rates were not significantly different for fibrinolysis and pPCI, both in the whole population (88% lysis, 85% pPCI) and in the population seen early (87% fibrinolysis, 85% pPCI beyond 90 minutes from call). Conclusions In a real-world setting, on a nationwide scale, a pharmaco-invasive strategy constitutes a valid alternative to pPCI, with 5-year survival at least equivalent to that of the reference reperfusion method. Clinical Trial Registration URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00673036. |
DOI | 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005874 |