Five-Year Survival in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction According to Modalities of Reperfusion Therapy The French Registry on Acute ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 Cohort

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreFive-Year Survival in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction According to Modalities of Reperfusion Therapy The French Registry on Acute ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 Cohort
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuteursDanchin N, Puymirat E, Steg PGabriel, Goldstein P, Schiele F, Belle L, Fajadet J, Khalife K, Coste P, Ferrieres J, Simon T, Investigators FAST-MI2005
JournalCIRCULATION
Volume129
Pagination1629-1636
Date PublishedAPR 22
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0009-7322
Mots-clésMyocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, pharmacologic actions, time
Résumé

Background Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred reperfusion method for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, it remains difficult to implement in many areas, and fibrinolytic therapy is still widely used. Methods and Results We assessed 5-year mortality in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction from the French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 according to use and type of reperfusion therapy. Of 1492 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with a first call 12 hours from onset, 447 (30%) received fibrinolysis (66% prehospital; 97% with subsequent angiography, 84% with subsequent PCI), 583 (39%) had pPCI, and 462 (31%) received no reperfusion. Crude 5-year survival was 88% for the fibrinolytic-based strategy, 83% for pPCI, and 59% for no reperfusion. Adjusted hazard ratios for 5-year death were 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.50-1.06) for fibrinolysis versus pPCI, 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.88) for prehospital fibrinolysis versus pPCI, and 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.91) for fibrinolysis versus pPCI beyond 90 minutes of call in patients having called 180 minutes from onset. In propensity score-matched populations, however, survival rates were not significantly different for fibrinolysis and pPCI, both in the whole population (88% lysis, 85% pPCI) and in the population seen early (87% fibrinolysis, 85% pPCI beyond 90 minutes from call). Conclusions In a real-world setting, on a nationwide scale, a pharmaco-invasive strategy constitutes a valid alternative to pPCI, with 5-year survival at least equivalent to that of the reference reperfusion method. Clinical Trial Registration URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00673036.

DOI10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005874