Pattern of occult nodal relapse diagnosed with F-18-fluoro-choline PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after prostate-only radiotherapy
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Pattern of occult nodal relapse diagnosed with F-18-fluoro-choline PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after prostate-only radiotherapy |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2014 |
Auteurs | Lepinoy A, Cochet A, Cueff A, Cormier L, Martin E, Maingon P, Bosset JFrancois, Brunotte F, Crehange G |
Journal | RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY |
Volume | 111 |
Pagination | 120-125 |
Date Published | APR |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 0167-8140 |
Mots-clés | (18)Fluoro-choline, Nodal relapse, PET/CT, Prostate cancer, Whole pelvic radiotherapy |
Résumé | {Introduction: The purpose of this study was to describe the pattern of nodal relapse with F-18-fluoro-choline (FCH) Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography (PET/CT) in prostate cancer patients after radiotherapy. Materials and methods: Eighty-three patients had a FCH PET/CT at time of biochemical failure. Of 65 patients with positive findings, 33 had positive nodes. This analysis included 31 patients who had undergone prior prostate-only radiotherapy with or without a prior radical prostatectomy. Each FCH positive node was assigned to a lymph node station with respect to the CTV defined by the RTOG guidelines (CTVRTOG). 3D mapping was performed after each node was manually placed in a reference planning CT scan after automatic co-registration of the two scans based on bone anatomy. Eighteen patients (58%) underwent focal salvage FCH PET-guided stereotactic radiotherapy with no hormones. Results: Fourteen patients (45.2%) had a relapse outside the CTVRTOG. Of the 17 patients with a positive node inside the CTVRTOG, 15 had a single node (88.2%) while seven patients out of the 13 evaluable patients (53.9%) who had a relapse outside the CTVRTOG had >= 2 positive nodes on FCH PET/CT (OR= 8.75, [95% Cl: 1.38-54.80] |
DOI | 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.03.008 |