Role of the process conditions on the sulphation and stability of a CuO/SBA-15 type SOx adsorbent in cycling operations

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreRole of the process conditions on the sulphation and stability of a CuO/SBA-15 type SOx adsorbent in cycling operations
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuteursBerger M., Dorge S., Nouali H., Habermacher D., Fiani E., Vierling M., Moliere M., Brilhac J.F, Patarin J.
JournalCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume350
Pagination729-738
Date PublishedOCT 15
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1385-8947
Mots-clésAdsorption step parameters adjustment, Desulphurization technology, Optimization process, Regenerable SOx adsorbent
Résumé

{SOx abatement is one of the major challenges for the industry with regards to the more stringent European regulations. Despite their good performance, current DeSOx technologies are energy-intensive and produce waste. Flue gas desulphurisation using SOx adsorbents thus is a viable alternative. However, the development of such a technology is still hampered by the adsorbent short lifetime within the wide range of conditions prevailing at the exhaust of combustion engines. In this work, a CuO/SBA-15 adsorbent was assessed as a SOx trap material under different sulphation conditions (temperature from 350 degrees C to 450 degrees C, gas composition (SO2: 250, 450 and 450 ppm; O-2: 150 vol%), GHSV from 18,000 to 110,000 h(-1) and sulphation time). The SO2 adsorption capacity of the adsorbent was greatly impacted by the temperature: the higher the temperature, the better the performance. Indeed, the dynamic adsorption capacity is equal to 31 mg(SO2)/g(ads), 37 mg(SO2)/g(ads) and 52 mg(SO2)/g(ads) at 350 degrees C, 400 degrees C and 450 degrees C respectively. Conversely, no significant changes in the SO2 dynamic adsorption capacity were observed whatever the SO2 and O-2 molar fractions in the adsorption gas stream. The GHSV appears as a very sensitive parameter since the higher this parameter, the worse the adsorbent performance (e.g. for GHSV of 25,000 h(-1)

DOI10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.170