The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreThe NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuteursArzoumanian Z, Baker PT, Blumer H, Becsy B, Brazier A, Brook PR, Burke-Spolaor S, Chatterjee S, Chen S, Cordes JM, Cornish NJ, Crawford F, H. Cromartie T, DeCesar ME, Demorest PB, Dolch T, Ellis JA, Ferrara EC, Fiore W, Fonseca E, Garver-Daniels N, Gentile PA, Good DC, Hazboun JS, A. Holgado M, Islo K, Jennings RJ, Jones ML, Kaiser AR, Kaplan DL, Kelley LZoltan, Key JShapiro, Laal N, Lam MF, T. Lazio JW, Lorimer DR, Luo J, Lynch RS, Madison DR, McLaughlin NA, Mingarelli CMF, Ng C, Nice DJ, Pennucci TT, Pol NS, Ransom SM, Ray PS, Shapiro-Albert BJ, Siemens X, Simon J, Spiewak R, Stairs IH, Stinebring DR, Stovall K, Sun JP, Swiggum JK, Taylor SR, Turner JE, Vallisneri M, Vigeland SJ, Witt CA, Collaboration NANOG
JournalASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume905
PaginationL34
Date PublishedDEC
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN2041-8205
Mots-clésAstronomy data analysis, gravitational waves, Millisecond pulsars, Pulsar timing method
Résumé

We search for an isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB) in the 12.5.yr pulsar-timing data set collected by the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves. Our analysis finds strong evidence of a stochastic process, modeled as a power law, with common amplitude and spectral slope across pulsars. Under our fiducial model, the Bayesian posterior of the amplitude for an f(-2/3) power-law spectrum, expressed as the characteristic GW strain, has median 1.92x10(-15) and 5%-95% quantiles of 1.37-2.67x10(-15) at a reference frequency of f(yr) = 1 yr(-1); the Bayes factor in favor of the common-spectrum process versus independent red-noise processes in each pulsar exceeds 10,000. However, we find no statistically significant evidence that this process has quadrupolar spatial correlations, which we would consider necessary to claim a GWB detection consistent with general relativity. We find that the process has neither monopolar nor dipolar correlations, which may arise from, for example, reference clock or solar system ephemeris systematics, respectively. The amplitude posterior has significant support above previously reported upper limits; we explain this in terms of the Bayesian priors assumed for intrinsic pulsar red noise. We examine potential implications for the supermassive black hole binary population under the hypothesis that the signal is indeed astrophysical in nature.

DOI10.3847/2041-8213/abd401