Two Under-Approximation Techniques for 3-Modal Abstraction Coverage of Event Systems: Joint Effort?
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Two Under-Approximation Techniques for 3-Modal Abstraction Coverage of Event Systems: Joint Effort? |
Type de publication | Conference Paper |
Year of Publication | 2017 |
Auteurs | Julliand J, Kouchnarenko O, Masson P-A, Voiron G |
Conference Name | PROCEEDINGS 11TH 2017 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (TASE) |
Publisher | IEEE Comp Soc; i3S; UCA JEDI; Inria; IEEE; TSCE; GDR GPL |
Conference Location | 345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA |
ISBN Number | 978-1-5386-1924-7 |
Mots-clés | event systems, may/must transitions, Predicate abstraction, test generation, under-approximation |
Résumé | Model-based testing of event systems can take advantage of considering abstractions rather than explicit models, for controlling their size. A test is then a connected and reachable event sequence. This paper reports on experiments made when adapting for event systems two known under-approximation techniques of predicate tri-modal (may, must+, must-) abstractions. We first instantiate all the abstract may transitions, preferably as reachable instances. Second, we complete this underapproximation with instantiations of Ball chains, i.e. sequences in the shape of must-*. may. must+* transitions, as such sequences are guaranteed to have connected instantiations. We present a backward symbolic instantiation algorithm for connecting these two under-approximations. We experimentally address the question of their complementarity. Surprisingly, our results show that Ball chains have not enhanced the coverage already achieved by the first step of may-transitions instantiation. However, it has enhanced the number of test steps by prolonging the already existing tests. |