Psychometric properties of the Resilience Scale-14 in a sample of college students from France
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Psychometric properties of the Resilience Scale-14 in a sample of college students from France |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2018 |
Auteurs | Cenat J.M, Hebert M., Karray A., Derivois D. |
Journal | ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE |
Volume | 44 |
Pagination | 517-522 |
Date Published | DEC |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 0013-7006 |
Mots-clés | French Resilience Scale-14, Parallel analysis, Psychometric properties, Validity |
Résumé | Introduction. - In recent years, the integration of resilience in several psychological and medical studies underscores a need for resilience assessment measures with robust psychometric properties. This study aimed to evaluate the underlying structure of the French version of the Resilience Scale (RS-14), a widely used measure to assess resilience both in general and clinical population. Method. - A sample of 2195 college students from France (18.68% of male; Mean age = 20.09 years old (+/- 1.21) completed the RS-14, the Child and Youth Resilience Measure, the Social Support Questionnaire and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. EFA with parallel analysis was conducted to assess the factorial structure of the RS-14 while CFA was performed to investigate the goodness-of-fit. Internal consistency, concurrent and convergent validity were evaluated. Results. - A one-dimensional-factorial-solution emerged from the EFA, its goodness-of-fit was adequate and it presented good internal consistency. As expected, the RS-14 score correlated positively to the CYRM and SSQ scores and negatively to the psychological distress score, supporting the validity of the scale. Conclusion. - The one-dimensional-factor corroborates the initial and many languages versions of the RS-14. The results showed that the French version of the RS-14 presents adequate psychometric properties and that is a reliable and valid scale in evaluating resilience. (C) 2018 L'Encephale, Paris. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.encep.2018.04.002 |