Factors Influencing Overall Survival for Patients With Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal-Cell Carcinoma in Daily Practice

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreFactors Influencing Overall Survival for Patients With Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal-Cell Carcinoma in Daily Practice
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuteursThiery-Vuillemin A, Cholley T, Calcagno F, Hugues M, Maurina T, Limat S, Hon TNguyen Tan, Almotlak H, Mouillet G, Nerich V
JournalCLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER
Volume16
PaginationE297-E305
Date PublishedAPR
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1558-7673
Mots-clésAntiangiogenic therapy, Metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, mTOR inhibitors, prognostic factors, survival, Targeted therapy
Résumé

{This retrospective study aimed to describe, in daily practice, factors associated with overall survival among 224 patients with metastatic clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. Different prognostic factors were identified in metastatic first-line and second-line treatment. These real-life data confirm the positive impact of targeted therapy and underline the importance of considering many factors to better estimate patient prognosis. Purpose: To describe factors associated with overall survival (OS) among patients with metastatic clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma (mccRCC) in regard to evolution of systemic therapies. Patients and Methods: Two hundred twenty-four consecutive patients with histologically confirmed mccRCC who received targeted therapy on first-line treatment between January 2007 and March 2015 were included. The primary end point was OS for metastatic first-line or second-line treatment. An analysis of prognostic factors of long survival was performed using a 2-step approach: univariate, then multivariate analysis. Results: Median OS [95% confidence interval] was 19.4 months [16.1-24.9]. Three prognostic factors were identified in first-line treatment: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) favorable and intermediate risks (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.362 [0.207-0.630] and 0.561 [0.393-0.801], respectively

DOI10.1016/j.clgc.2017.09.006